RODEN'S PROFILE
He/Him
Artist, Game Designer, Furry, Rat-Dog
Working on a game project in RMMZ since 2025.
Artist, Game Designer, Furry, Rat-Dog
Working on a game project in RMMZ since 2025.
Search
Filter
[Poll] Judging whether to download a game? What do you look for?
I have more time to write stuff now, so I figured I'd go into more detail about the different choices like alterego did:
Description: I'll generally only bother to read the description if the game already interested me with the graphics and presentation.
Game Page Presentation: This hardly matters to me. I like a well designed CSS as much as the next guy, but it's just fluff. It has nothing to do with the game, so you'd be better off focusing on having good screenshots.
Download Amounts: This is like "number of subscribers" in terms of importance. It basically means nothing to me. I'm sure I would appreciate a high download count as a developer, but it makes no impact on my decision to be interested in a game.
Graphics: This is the most important part of a game in terms of presentation and marketing, honestly. If the game doesn't look nice then the bottom line is that most people won't want to play it. When I look for a game on this site I look for stuff with interesting menus, maps, characters, art, and so on. I easily pass by stuff that uses Rudras or rips in general (unless they're used VERY well like in Everlasting Journey and Starless Umbra).
Videos of the project: I'm sure that if I was drawn to the project I'd love to see videos of it before downloading. I've never really noticed this around RMN though, most people don't seem to do it.
Creator: This varies, I guess. It really only comes into play when someone reaches amazing levels of fame or becomes well known for their prowess in game design, like kentona, Craze, & dragonheartman. Also it seems that European creators just kick serious ass at everything.
Comments: Honestly I don't really read main game page comments unless I'm the developer. I go over the ones on images because there's usually less of them, and they're more interesting to read.
Game Score: Higher rated games with lots of reviews stand out to me like they would to anyone, yeah. This is a hard thing to get a good feel about on RMN, since only a few games get a fair number of reviews for a truly honest score. Even then I don't often agree with it, like Forever's End being highly rated. My tastes differ from most people's, I guess.
Reviews: I can't say that I read them. Unless I'm the developer, that is. I don't know, I don't really need to hear an essay about how great/shitty something is when I could play it myself.
Hype: I almost never agree with the hype. Case in point, Forever's End.
Features: This can play a big role in it, I suppose. It works like you'd expect it to, I find certain features interesting and it makes me like the game more.
Recommendations: See Hype + Review answers.
Description: I'll generally only bother to read the description if the game already interested me with the graphics and presentation.
Game Page Presentation: This hardly matters to me. I like a well designed CSS as much as the next guy, but it's just fluff. It has nothing to do with the game, so you'd be better off focusing on having good screenshots.
Download Amounts: This is like "number of subscribers" in terms of importance. It basically means nothing to me. I'm sure I would appreciate a high download count as a developer, but it makes no impact on my decision to be interested in a game.
Graphics: This is the most important part of a game in terms of presentation and marketing, honestly. If the game doesn't look nice then the bottom line is that most people won't want to play it. When I look for a game on this site I look for stuff with interesting menus, maps, characters, art, and so on. I easily pass by stuff that uses Rudras or rips in general (unless they're used VERY well like in Everlasting Journey and Starless Umbra).
Videos of the project: I'm sure that if I was drawn to the project I'd love to see videos of it before downloading. I've never really noticed this around RMN though, most people don't seem to do it.
Creator: This varies, I guess. It really only comes into play when someone reaches amazing levels of fame or becomes well known for their prowess in game design, like kentona, Craze, & dragonheartman. Also it seems that European creators just kick serious ass at everything.
Comments: Honestly I don't really read main game page comments unless I'm the developer. I go over the ones on images because there's usually less of them, and they're more interesting to read.
Game Score: Higher rated games with lots of reviews stand out to me like they would to anyone, yeah. This is a hard thing to get a good feel about on RMN, since only a few games get a fair number of reviews for a truly honest score. Even then I don't often agree with it, like Forever's End being highly rated. My tastes differ from most people's, I guess.
Reviews: I can't say that I read them. Unless I'm the developer, that is. I don't know, I don't really need to hear an essay about how great/shitty something is when I could play it myself.
Hype: I almost never agree with the hype. Case in point, Forever's End.
Features: This can play a big role in it, I suppose. It works like you'd expect it to, I find certain features interesting and it makes me like the game more.
Recommendations: See Hype + Review answers.
[Poll] Judging whether to download a game? What do you look for?
Usually it's the graphical presentation that draws me to a game. Frankly I probably wouldn't even read the description of a bad looking game unless people in the forums were crapping their pants about how good it was.
What Videogames Are You Playing Right Now?
I'm playing Pokemon Heartgold mostly. Me and my friend are having a race and I'm completely toasting him at it (I'm almost at Chuck, he just beat Whitney). Since I can't play HG when he's not around playing SS, I had to start another run of Pokemon Platinum to fill the void.
I also just started what has to be my 20th run of Paper Mario. Gotta get that MFD inspiration, man.
EDIT: As always, I'm also playing League every now and then.
I also just started what has to be my 20th run of Paper Mario. Gotta get that MFD inspiration, man.
EDIT: As always, I'm also playing League every now and then.
The Screenshot Topic Returns
@Brady: I would suggest editing your character sprite, as it really doesn't fit in with that style at all. Also, the edges of the trees are mighty square in comparison to the tops and bottoms.
Other than that it looks good though.
Other than that it looks good though.
The Screenshot Topic Returns
author=Craze
yeah the trees look weird
like the colors are fine but they look like a filter, not shading. they're still flat and not like that guy's afro
Well, I just got the go ahead on a couple of ideas from matrixmancs, so I'll be working on other stuff for the time being. I certainly need to learn how to properly sprite trees when I make a return to this tile-set though.
The Screenshot Topic Returns
author=alterego
@MrCharlesMugford: I don't like those trees. I liked the plain old ones better. =/ ...Well, I have nothing against that leaf-ish texture you're aiming for, but if you could accomplish it with less colors, that'd be great. You're using like twice as many colors in those trees than anything else in your game, and that sticks out like a sore thumb.
I believe in the last blog post on MFD I clarified that we were re-working things now that we backed out of a hasty Release Something Demo. Perhaps I wasn't clear about everything that we were re-working though. The graphics for the other areas in the game will have a similar level of detail to them once I get around to fixing everything up.
Now, being that this particular tile-set is still in the works, I probably will remove a few shades from each of the trees. I still have to figure it out, really, as I'm thinking that because of the complex mapping involved World 2 will probably be one of the last ones designed. There's plenty of room for experimentation in that time period. I'll be keeping the array of colours though, I've already decided that it will look that way.
Like so:

The Screenshot Topic Returns
author=Liberty
T-The trees all have grumpy :3 faces. Dat's kinda cute. Intentional?
It wasn't intentional, but I did realize that they were there once I shaded everything.
The Screenshot Topic Returns
author=slashphoenix
Is the ground done? 'Cuz it looks mega weird with no detail compared to the super-detailed/shaded trees.
Although I do think the trees themselves look cool as heck.
Nah, the ground isn't finished yet. It's been part of my style for a long time to keep the ground as simple as possible, but I'm thinking of changing it up a bit. I'll post the results when I do, of course. (Either way, once ground effects like rocks and bushes are done it will be more vibrant.
EDIT: Page sniped myself:

The Screenshot Topic Returns

I may have created the most impossibly tedious tile-set to map with. Ever.
I may need to tone down the colours or normalize them a bit if people think it will be distracting. The way it's working now it seems like it won't be, but once I get the enemies, ground effects, and objects into the map it will probably turn into a problem.














