TOPIC BANNING
Posts
Pages:
1
Well, I thought of an idea for topics that become flame wars. What if moderators are given the ability to ban certain members from topics if a flame war begins, instead of locking the topic or banning the member altogether? This is just an attempt to try and salvage some kind of intellectual debate between members, and also gives a greater chance of people getting to voice their opinions instead of reading through locked topic after locked topic that resulted from a flame war that broke out, and lets them continue posting and makes the flamers stop. This is just a suggestion mind you, and I've never seen it done in any other forums and think that it's possibly a good idea. Although I could be entirely out of my mind on this one and might make the forums for lax for flame wars. So anyways.. yay or nay?
To be honest, this sort of thing is pretty much futile, imo.
A topic that turns into a flame war is well on it's way to invoking Godwin's Law and is generally so dumbed down by that point (see the abortion topic, where the ONLY thing on the last page was cheesy rhetoric) that there is no feasible choice but to lock it.
A topic that turns into a flame war is well on it's way to invoking Godwin's Law and is generally so dumbed down by that point (see the abortion topic, where the ONLY thing on the last page was cheesy rhetoric) that there is no feasible choice but to lock it.
No, not at all. I'm just saying for people in general that get into fights. Just because you start them intentionally doesn't mean I made this topic for you :P
author=Natook link=topic=2371.msg42377#msg42377 date=1226124403
I'm saying I was jacking with everyone to display a need for a topic banning option :P
Well, now perhaps I should ban you to display a need for a complex system of check and balances on administrative power.
If this is actually true, this is pretty childish.
Pages:
1
















